Owning and maintaining any airplane is tough. It is more challenging when that airplane is a warbird, with specialized maintenance and parts challenges. The O-2 has definite advantages over some
other Warbirds, like a P-51 or a B-17, but challenges exist.
More joys in antique Warbird ownership.
At the end of November, I took advantage of some really nice weather and went out to a nearby, nice, but relatively quiet airfield to practice overhead approaches. The fuel is also significantly cheaper there than at my home airport. Everything fine until leaving the pattern, when the landing gear became an issue.
As a side comment, I do not put the landing gear away until the airplane is 500’ AGL. Acceleration altitude: 500’ AGL; confirm airspeed (not too slow not too fast); ops normal; and then the gear come up; flaps come up and climb power set. It is NOT a good idea to put the Skypig’s gear up at two indications of PRC. The gear retraction introduces so much drag that there are estimates of 250 fpm DESCENT doing that with an engine out. Don’t touch nothin’ until 500’AGL.
Anyway, turning crosswind, I put the gear handle up. Everything seemed normal, gear were moving and there was the familiar “clunk” of the gear locking up. BUT…the handle did not pop into up neutral and the amber light did not come on. (Note: This is one of those civilian conversion issues. In the USAF O-2A, the amber light is on in transit and goes out when the gear are locked up. When registering it for normal category it has to match the O-2B/C-337 process of not turning on until the gear are locked up.) I tapped the handle. The book says that sometimes it sticks up and a tap will set it. (although the amber light should already be lit.) Didn’t move. Then I notice that my airspeed is way low for the power setting. I do the logical thing to do ONCE. Reset the landing gear. Everything seems normal, gear come down, comfortable thump, green light on. So we go up again. No light, handle does not pop to up neutral. It is now about sunset and I can’t see much from the wing mounted mirror, although it looks like the gear are up but the front doors are open. I proceed home and have a wonderfully normal landing.
Later, I open and close the doors using the hand pumps. Everything seems fine. No visible obstruction. A week later, next good flying weather, I do the logical thing. I take it around the pattern. This time I have my 12 year old son with my oh so precious former East German Zeiss binocular watching me. Being somewhat more worried about the binocular than the landing gear I head skyward. Same thing. It is now daylight and when I look in the mirror it looks like all landing gear doors are open. Now I have fun. I tell the tower I may have a landing gear problem. They confirm gear up, doors open. (My son provided a somewhat more detailed but consistent description later.) Every other airplane in or approaching the pattern starts radio chatter expecting the field to be closed for an emergency. There was none, happily.
Anyway, after consultation with my mechanic and some extensive troubleshooting, we discover that the bolt and roller bearing that comes into contact with the up-lock switch are missing! Gone. Worse than gone. The bolt broke off about 1/16” below the collar of the nose gear trunion. Guess what that meant?
a) We were going to have a wonderful time finding an obscure part for a 47 year old airplane that has been out of service and out of production for 35 years
b) That we had to remove the nose gear assembly to get the old bolt out; or
Fortunately, the answer was not (c) but (b) was bad enough. The good news was that when we got the gear out we found the broken bolt and roller bearing in the wheel well (you don’t have to be good if you are lucky.) Further, the bolt was a standard AN bolt! The bad news is that even with contributing my active labor and time off of work, it was 13 hours of shop time to take the nose gear out, rout the remnants old bolt out and reinstall everything.
But the story is not over! When we contacted Don Nieser of Commodore Aerospace, he checked the O-2s he has for rebuild. He found one up-lock roller broken and three bent! Every time the gear retracts, the roller hits the up-lock. After 8,000 hours and 47 years of strikes, the bolt weakens.
I would say that it is an easy enough repair to make if you don’t wait until it breaks. The bolt can be reached with the landing gear down and locked. The bolt itself is a standard AN bolt that costs about 75 cents. The catch is that, at least for mine, it was in so tight that it could not be removed with an easy out. My mechanic broke 3 bits trying that. He finally had to carefully drill it completely out and then pick out the threats (hence part of the 13 hours shop time.)
If you can get a good grip on it and work it out without removing the landing gear, replacing the bolt before it breaks might be worth a thought.
And with regard to the November 10 post. It only seems to drip fuel in my hangar. Over a week in the maintenance shop, on jacks, fuel selectors on and not so much as a drop of fuel leaked. Gremlins.
10 Nov 14
Nothing significant to report, which is almost a miracle. Airplanes do not like to sit, and for various reasons, 424 sat for over a month during the fall temperature changes. I went out to the plane to fly some Young Eagles for the EAA on Saturday and found the right brake pedal went all the way to the ground and some leaking from one of the fuel drain lines of the rear engine. Put 5606H in the affected cylinder, pumped it all through the lines and everything seems fine. No obvious leaks. Looking again today with the sun shining into the hangar, I can see a couple of spot where something may have dripped through the line and out the relief valve. I will probably spend some time with it tomorrow. The fuel drain line leak has happened before. Some drips between Saturday and today (Monday) by no observable fuel loss from the calibrated fuel dip stick. So, of the time being, I make sure the fuel selector valves are set to OFF and will dive back into the maintenance manual before talking to Geoff (my mechanic).
Annual inspection was completed a couple of weeks ago. Major events included new tires (there is an age limit as well as a wear limit) and repair to a fuel tank. I had been suspicious that one fuel tank was losing fuel somehow. It turned out that a patch had been improperly sealed by the previous owner and the sealant deteriorated because of contact with (wait for it…) AVGAS. The rest of the story…When the O-2As are registered as civilian aircraft, certain things have to be done to "de-militarize" them. One of these is removing the foam from the fuel tank which makes it fire retardant. Not a major concern since no one SHOULD be shooting at us. A hole has to be cut into the top of the tank, the foam removed, and then the tank patched. The hole is at the very top of the outboard main fuel tank. This means that fuel only came into contact with the (bad) sealant when the tank was full. Therefore it took about 10 years to turn the sealant into goo. All fixed now. (The bank account will take time to recover.) I also had the prop tips painted a proper yellow and swapped out the A-37 gunsight that came with the airplane for a proper O-2A gunsight (and then get it working). Related to that is another little thing. Someone from the local FAA office made an issue with my mechanic about the weapons pylons on the plane. He said that I could not fly the airplane with them on the wings unless I re-registered the airplane as experimental. Don Nieser at Commodore Areospace was able to provide the letter from FAA aircraft certification branch that confirmed that the airplane was originally certified with the pylons (and military seat belts, military specific engine gauges, jettisonable door, etc.) and did NOT need special permission to fly with that equipment installed. The focus now are those little post-maintenance things that always seem to pop-up (like the front EGT gauge which I just replaced last year). The major effort is cosmetic work to get the airplane ready to go to EAA AirVenture in a few weeks.
25 May 2014
OK, since the last entry, the brake problem was resolved. Thanks again to Don Neiser of Commodore Aerospace. Everything was fixed before the Manassas Airshow and I was able to make a few pre-show passes with the mock-up weapons installed on the hard points. Right now it is in for annual inspection. I want to spend resources on continuing to improve the appearance, but those resources keep getting diverted towards fixing the things that just need to be replaced in a 46 year old airplane. These events include: Replace wing strut fairings (one separated rather dramatically in flight enroute to OSH last year.) New tires (airplane tires both wear out and age out. This was age-deterioration.) Prop repainted (finally getting the yellow tips it was supposed to have had.) Swapped out the A-37 gunsight which the previous owner had installed for the correct O-2A gunsight. (Thanks again to Don Neiser.) Fixed the copilot seat (worth a post all by itself.) The most interesting piece has been repair of one of the main fuel tanks. My A&P noted Avgas leaking everywhere. NOT a good thing. He had to remove the tank. (It is only money.) He found that, in removing the foam from the tank (the stuff that made it self-sealing), the previous owner had not sealed the tank properly. Either it was the wrong sealer or it was mixed improperly. The end result was that AVGAS was eating through the sealant. Because the patch was on the top of the tank, AVGAS could not really get to it (or the tank leak) unless the main tank was full. Hence it took a long time for the sealant to finally turn into goo. The nice thing is that I will have it done in time for some serious work on fairings, plastic trip repair, and touch-up paint before the next two events: National Air and Space Museum on 14 June and then Oshkosh in July.
9 March 2014
Building on the my comment below that there is nothing cheap about owning a Warbird. Let me add, "or easy" to that. Of course, the brake problem could not have been anything as simple as a bleed valve. It was the brake housing itself that cracked (47 years old. Lots of hard use before and after sitting in the Arizona sun for 15 years without maintenance.) On the O-2A page of this website, I listed "Heavy Duty Brakes" as being one of the USAF changes. Yep. Than included the housing. Normal Cessna part numbers for Cessna C337B thru D right brake housing is C163030-0404 or 0406. For the O-2 (Cessna M337B) it is -0408. Winter seems to be finally over, but the sky pig is grounded looking for a part that has probably been out of production since 1978 or earlier.
21 Feb 2014
On the EAA Warbirds forum, there is a thread going responding to someone who is looking for an inexpensive warbird. The general consensus in response to him is that there is no such thing. 424 is a case in point. I have a world of respect for the guys who can devote the time and effort to keep up a Mustang or a Texan. Most of these people have figured out corporate support, partnerships, and other means to feed their plane and passion. Many others are doing it as their own passion, with the patience and support of their family. Even though the O-2 is nowhere near the same level as those North American airplanes, it definitely shares some of the warbird upkeep.
First thing to keep in mind is that all of these warbirds are old. The Vietnam era planes are the youngest, at 40+ years. Now, that is still younger than most or all of the B-52 and C-130 airframes in the USAF. On the other hand, I (and other warbird owners) do not have the resources of the United States Air Force to throw at it to keep it repaired and flying. For one thing, that means that spare parts, which are always expensive for any airplane, become even more rare and more expensive for airplanes no longer in production or part of the DoD supply chain. Parts wear out. O-rings get hard. Plexiglass crazes. And then there is corrosion. Owners of antique cars have similar problems, and I respect what they do, too.
A 45 year old civilian C-337 would also be a challenge to keep up for these same reasons. As I pointed out on the "Plane" page, the O-2A (Cessna designation M337B) is NOT exactly a civilian Skymaster. All of the differences listed on that page are associated with different parts. Since the USAF only bought 501 of these to begin with, that adds to the problem. Some of these parts were and are common to other military equipment. Some are unique to the O-2, and within that, the O-2A, and within that, the difference between early and late model O-2As.
I am not complaining, just explaining. I have no desire to swap 424 for a civilian Skymaster or a newer airplane (although a C-206 seems nice from time to time.)
Thankfully, there are some people who are dedicated to keeping the 50 or so O-2As that remain flying doing just that. Commodore Aerospace, headed up by Don Nieser deserves special mention -- and deserves a visit to his website. Not only is he a great source for parts and advice, he also restores airplanes and gets them out and flying again. Thankfully, too, BECAUSE of its former history, I don't need to worry so much about corrosion; the entire airframe having been thoroughly covered in zinc chromate.
Parts aside, I feel a responsibility to keep the airplane up properly, that is, as a living heritage of our nation's military history and to the men who fought for our country. That means that I am somewhat constrained by what I can and can't do with the plane. I have to keep it looking right on the outside. Inside I have to make trade-offs as it has the dual purpose of being a family plane AND it has to fly in the modern airspace system. I have seen some O-2As which are just about as original on the inside as they can be. I am glad that those pilots are out there. Me, I make compromises. I have a newer attitude indicator, a Garmin 530W with GTX 330 (I can't use the IFF transponder…I think) and an STEC 50 autopilot. I also have a Shadin fuel flow gauge with Gamijectors. If the airplanes were still in service, I reason, they would have been upgraded even more than that.
Anyway, I am NOT complaining. It is, however, a significantly greater challenge than owning other airplanes. On the plus side, it is easier to justify paying hangar rent.
All of the above is because I went out to fly today…the first time in a month because polar freeze we have all been enjoying. Plane started right up (I have a sum heater and trickle charger) only to find no pressure for the right brake. The 45 year old right brake bleed line did't survive the freeze.